Please read… This is a clear example of why it is so necessary to utilize the help of a surrogacy agency in lieu of finding a surrogate on your own.
By Louise Eccles
PUBLISHED: 16:43 EST, 5 March 2014 | UPDATED: 21:00 EST, 5 March 2014
Unable to have children of her own, a woman had done a deal with a close friend who was ‘artificially inseminated at home’ with her husband’s sperm.
Legal chaos ensued after the couple’s relationship broke down within months of the little boy’s birth, the High Court heard.
Now, in a case serving as a warning against illegal private surrogacy deals, the woman has been refused recognition as the boy’s legal mother
A judge has warned of the dangers of informal surrogacy agreements after a woman found she had no parental rights to the baby she had asked her friend to conceive with her husband.
The ‘do it yourself’-style surrogate pregnancy ended in the High Court after the boy, now three, was effectively left with two mothers.
Unable to have children of her own, a woman asked a close friend to be artificially inseminated at home with her husband’s sperm.
But when the woman’s marriage broke down months after the birth of the child, she found she had no parental rights because she was not the boy’s legal or biological mother.
Yesterday, she was granted a residency order to care for the child, but the judge warned against anyone considering an informal surrogacy agreement, rather than through a professional agency.
Describing the case as a ‘cautionary tale’, Mrs Justice Eleanor King underlined the ‘real dangers’ of private surrogacy agreements and urged couples to use licensed and regulated fertility clinics.
Even then, surrogacy contracts are not enforceable and a gestational surrogate can always change her mind about handing the child to the couple.
The father and surrogate were named on the toddler’s birth certificate and, in the eyes of the law, they are his parents.
The judge said medics had spotted something was amiss when the surrogate booked herself in at the Leicester Royal Infirmary to give birth.
Doctors insisted on seeing a formal surrogacy agreement and the couple went to a firm of solicitors, who drafted an agreement.
Mrs Justice King said the solicitors unwittingly committed a crime when they drafted it, because they charged for the preparation of the agreement, which is in breach of the Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985.
The couple’s relationship broke down soon after the birth and they have since divorced. The court heard they made a second legal error when they failed to seek court recognition of the woman’s parenthood within six months of the birth.
The judge said the time limit was mandatory and making a parental order in the woman’s favour was ‘not an option’.
Read more: Do it yourself surrogate pregnancy
The Surrogacy SOURCE has warm, compassionate case managers (many of whom have been surrogates themselves) ready to help you in your journey. We have available surrogates pre-screened; personally met and ready to match. Contact us today! (949) 872-2800 or Toll free in the US (877) 375-8888 or visit us at http://www.TheSurrogacySOURCE.com